A gloved hand holding a test tube in a lab

Foghorn

Creating clean fuel from seawater

Discontinued Project/2016

Project Foghorn aimed to radically reduce greenhouse gas emissions by pulling carbon and hydrogen out of seawater and combining it to create a new type of carbon-neutral fuel. The team successfully created methanol using this method, however they weren’t able to do so at a cost competitive with gasoline. The team published its research and analysis to help other inventors, scientists, and engineers advance the search for new carbon-neutral fuels.

Kathy Hannun, Project Lead for Foghorn

Turning Seawater Into Fuel

Burning fossil fuels accounts for nearly 97% of transportation-related greenhouse gases.  Inspired by a scientific paper, the Foghorn team started collaborating with researchers at Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) to develop an end-to-end prototype and see if it was possible to reduce those emissions by making “seawater fuel.” The idea was to take seawater, which naturally absorbs CO₂ from the atmosphere, use electrolysis to extract the CO₂, then combine it with hydrogen in a prototype reactor to create methanol—a liquid fuel which could be used as liquid fuel.

How It Works

1. ABSORPTION

The sea naturally absorbs carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

2. Processing

Carbon dioxide is extracted from seawater and hydrogen is produced via electrolysis using renewable energy sources.

3. Synthesis

Inside a catalytic reactor, hydrogen is reacted with carbon dioxide to make a liquid fuel for vehicles — what we call sea fuel.

4. Consumption

Vehicles are powered by sea fuel. Carbon dioxide from vehicles is re-absorbed into the sea to be used again.

Cost Challenges

After months of development, the team successfully produced methanol. But creating the fuel wasn't the hard part—creating it at a reasonable cost was. Early theoretical models suggested that it would be possible to make seawater fuel for somewhere between $5 and $10 per gasoline gallon equivalent (GGE). So, the team set a cost target of $8 per GGE and outlined a plan to reduce the cost to $5 per GGE within five years. This way, seawater fuel would be cost-competitive enough to give them a foothold in markets where gas is expensive, like Nordic countries.

However, as the team’s investigation continued, some barriers to meeting these targets became apparent. First, producing enough fuel would require a significant amount of seawater—an incredibly expensive process. The second challenge was finding a cheap source of hydrogen, a key ingredient. After investigating a number of hydrogen creation processes, they came across a technique called solid oxide electrolysis, which separates water into hydrogen and oxygen using electricity. Unfortunately, after meeting with numerous experts, the team learned that generating a reliable and cheap source of hydrogen would take more than five years of research and require substantial capital investment.

Various samples and materials used by the Foghorn team to develop seawater fuel

The Future of Sea Fuel

In January 2016, after two years of work, the team decided to end their investigation. The cost models sent a loud-and-clear message: given the current and projected cost of hydrogen, seawater fuel wasn’t economically viable to pursue at that time.

The project was far from wasted time and energy. The team published its work in the International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, in the hope that builders, inventors, scientists, and engineers around the globe could build on Foghorn’s  work.  While Foghorn didn’t create a commercial seawater fuel, it contributed valuable knowledge to the ongoing search for sustainable, carbon-neutral fuel alternatives.